Chairman Tauzin

Prepared Witness Testimony

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce

W.J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman

Link to Committee Tip Line:  Fight Waste, Fraud and Abuse
   

 

 

Impediments to Digital Trade

Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection
May 22, 2001
2:00 PM
2322 Rayburn House Office Building 

 

 
 

Mr. George Vradenburg
Executive Vice President Global and Stategic Policy
AOL/Time Warner
1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC, 20036

Chairman Stearns, Mr. Towns and Members of the Subcommittee. I want to thank you for holding this important hearing on digital trade issues. At AOL Time Warner, we believe that Congress and the Administration, in partnership with the US business community, should commit ourselves to advancing global economic prosperity and social progress through a trade agenda that fosters the global electronic exchange of information and commerce.

AOL Time Warner is the world’s leading Internet-powered multi-media company, with a stable of brands including AOL, Warner Bros, Warner Music Group, HBO, Time Warner Cable, Time Inc. and the Turner Networks, including CNN.

In this, the Internet Century, consumers worldwide are driving the demand for greater choice and convenience. The AOL Time Warner company is committed to the proposition that new combinations of skills, technology, and talents are essential to create the innovations that will respond to this global demand. Our company is responding with new forms of content and delivery platforms, innovative services that will make new consumer devices work together seamlessly, and new means to "connect the dots" to make technology easy-to-use for consumers. We intend to bring the power of information and the promise of connection to more people around the world. Our ability to achieve this goal depends upon working with you, your colleagues in the Congress, and the Administration to frame the international trade environment that will enable consumers to take full advantage of the Internet revolution.

We believe that there are three powerful and related trends that are fundamentally reshaping the global economy. The first is the exponential growth in connectivity resulting from increased adoption of information and communications technologies. The second is the convergence of historically distinct communications systems and consumer devices. And the third is the increasing use of electronic communications as a channel for connecting consumers and companies and driving international business and social communities. In the aggregate, these forces are accelerating the process known as globalization, a process that I believe promises economic and social benefits to consumers, workers and citizens worldwide.

Today, more than 300 million people are online. By the year 2005, more than 1 billion people will be connected to the Internet, more than 75 percent of them outside of North America. This technological transformation is creating a networked global economy that is just beginning to demonstrate that the Internet can be a powerful engine for individual opportunity, economic prosperity and social progress.

Recently, a new study done by Caroline Freund of the Federal Reserve Board and Diana Weinhold of the London School of Economics determined just how big a difference the Web has made to trade. Looking at trade flows among 56 countries from 1995 to 1999, for the first two years, they found no impact from the Net. But starting in 1997, as Web usage accelerated, they discovered that a 10 percent increase in the number of a nation's Web sites would have led to a 1 percent rise in its trade flows in 1998 and 1999. The impact was strongest for poorer countries -- suggesting that nations with fewer initial trade links can reap larger relative gains from the Web, assuming they have made basic infrastructure and technology investments.

The rapid growth of Internet usage in China also demonstrates that the appetite for electronic networks as a tool for economic reform and access to information extends well beyond the so-called developed nations and is being embraced by nations and cultures that are not employing traditional notions of "capitalism" and "democracy" in their historic development.

And the benefits of electronic commerce and digitized trade extend far beyond the immediate financial gain of the participants. Perceived social and economic benefits of global electronic networks include:

  • stimulating new opportunities and investments in emerging markets by reducing the costs and barriers to reaching electronic consumers in developed markets;
  • extending global electronic markets to all nations and thus bringing the benefits of choice and network economies of scope and scale to all consumers;
  • providing people in historically underserved nations and areas with increased access to education, health care and other public services;
  • promoting greater and more rapid access to information for children of all ages and in all nations; and
  • giving people everywhere the capability of promoting their local industry and cultures without losing the benefits of participation in the global economy.

These benefits create a win-win-win situation in which the same set of actions – promoting increased digital communications and trade – brings economic and social benefits to governments, industry and individuals around the world. We have an obligation to act now to deliver on the promise of these benefits, and to promote digitized trade-friendly policies with our trading partners around the world.

We all know that adoption of the capability for increased digital communications and trade around the world isn't going to happen on its own. In fact, the opposite is true : absent affirmative action on our part, global protectionism and fragmentation may take hold. If that proves to be the case, the promise of economic opportunity and broader knowledge of the world will pass too many by -- the social and economic repercussions of that neglect will not only be felt in the developing world, we all will feel it.

In a world of increasing connection, our own economic and social well being is inextricably tied to the economic and social progress of other nations and peoples. A stable world order, characterized by peace and prosperity, demands that we respond to the universal yearning for economic opportunity and social connection.

The Framework for a Global Networked Society

At AOL Time Warner, we support a basic framework for a networked global society, to bring the benefits of economic and social connectivity, including economic prosperity, increased knowledge and expanded trade, to everyone. That framework should include:

  • A recognition that current WTO obligations, rules, disciplines and commitments should apply to e-commerce and acknowledgement that electronically delivered goods and services should receive no less favorable treatment under trade rules and commitments than like products delivered in physical form.
  • An understanding that universal and affordable access for consumers to basic and valued-added communications services is critical to expanding the reach of electronic economic opportunity.
  • An appreciation that all aspects of the e-commerce value chain must be free from trade barriers in order to prevent the weakest link from breaking the benefits of the chain.
  • A new approach to content development and protection that safeguards the interests of the artists, while promoting the development of local content and providing consumers with the widest array of choice.
  • A commitment that no man, woman or child is left behind in the Internet age. The age where economic and social "divides " should be put behind us. The Internet offers us a new opportunity to extend economic opportunity to more people, and we, as the champions of opportunity and freedom, should grab the historic opportunity presented to us by this remarkable new technology.

The Key Issues We Must Tackle to Create the Global Networked Society

There are six key sets of issues that we must collectively tackle to ensure the creation of a global networked society.

First, and most important, is a lowering of telecommunications costs. Consumers cannot gain access to the benefits of electronic trade in commerce and ideas unless they can afford access to the basic means of connection. Affordability can best be assured through privatization and competition in telecommunications, a structure that requires independent regulation of historic monopolies to assure cost-based consumer pricing and interconnection rates. Just as important is the pricing structure used. Research, as well as common sense, tells us that metered pricing of Internet use is the enemy of Internet adoption and usage; if people are "watching the clock" while they are online, fearful of large metered monthly phone bills, they will spend less time online or won't go online at all. For that reason, we support pro-competitive telecommunications policy throughout the globe that will result in affordable pricing for Internet access to all end users.

Second, the market for information technology products and services must be more open and accessible. Ideally, we would like to see the greatest variety of information and communications devices and services available to the broadest possible audience. Particular emphasis should be on lowering tariffs on high technology goods and software so that more people in more countries can afford the technology they need to get online and companies can build the state-of -the art networks needed to bring the benefits of the Internet to all.

Third, we advocate clear and effective protection for intellectual property rights. Widespread investment in computer software and the other cultural products and services that will drive Internet adoption and use worldwide requires that those essential ingredients to a networked global economy be protected. At the same time, network operators cannot be crippled with liability for the unknowing transmission of infringing materials. Intellectual property concerns can only be addressed on a global basis -- In some countries, we have made great strides in protecting intellectual property and balancing the rights and obligations of content owners and online distributors. An extension of this balance of protections in more countries, to more people, will power local cultural industries and will bring a new creative spirit to the non-English speaking Internet community worldwide.

Fourth, we support the free flow of goods and services across a range of sectors that make up the e-commerce value chain. This begins with lower tariffs on the goods and services that form the building blocks of the Internet architecture, and include reducing barriers to advertising, financial services and internet billing and payments, distribution of content – including movies and music, express delivery services and customs modernization. We must address these "barriers" to e-commerce in a holistic and comprehensive fashion. Without such a commitment, even one weak link in the e-commerce value chain can undermine the potentially explosive growth of e-commerce and productivity enhancement, new job creation and expanded consumer choice and opportunity.

Fifth, to ensure that tax policy does not impede the tremendous growth of e-commerce, governments around the world need to identify a tax collection system that maintains market neutrality while still addressing governments’ legitimate need to fund public services. To ensure that these interests are balanced, tax systems should not create market distortions, discourage transacting business on the Internet or impose greater administrative burdens on one type of supplier than on another. The goal should be to achieve a simple, efficient, and fair tax regime appropriate to a new global networked economy—a system that promotes rather than stifles free trade.

Sixth, we must be as committed to the free flow of information and ideas as we are to the free flow of commerce. Economic, social and political innovation is the product of the exchange of ideas and information. Human progress is measured not just by commerce and technology, but by innovation in the systems for economic opportunity and personal expression and understanding. We in this country will benefit by an openness to greater information from and understanding of the rest of the world, just as the remainder of the world will benefit by a greater understanding of the principles of freedom and opportunity we enjoy here. We recognize that traditional notions of national security and, protection of children among others, may provide a justification for national regulation in this area. And we believe that private sector commitments to battle child pornography, share ideas on the security of critical infrastructures and fostering local cultural diversity can assist public administrations in advancing national objectives in those areas. But we would urge that limitations on the free flow of information and ideas, just like limitations on the free flow of goods and services, should be adopted only after careful consideration, lest the social or economic benefits of human exchange not just on a local but also a global level be lost or mitigated.

Finally, consumer confidence in the online medium must be enhanced. Here we believe that industry has and should continue to play a leadership role in developing and promulgating standards and practices that will enhance consumer confidence in the online medium. Online users continue to be concerned about the privacy and security of their personal information and about the integrity of online transactions. Global business organizations, such as the Global Business Dialogue on Electronic Commerce, recognize that our online business depends on the confidence of consumers. We, and other electronic commerce businesses, have adopted world class data collection and consumer protection practices, and we are working collaboratively with governments to ensure that consumer concerns are being appropriately addressed.

The Process for Achieving a Global Networked Society

These are what I believe are the essentials of a digital trade agenda. Let me now briefly outline how we might collectively advance this agenda.

We believe that America’s digital trade agenda can best be pursued through a multilateral, regional and bilateral approach. This includes pursuing initiatives through the WTO, including a possible new round of trade negotiations, and through regional venues such as the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas and APEC. Digital trade can also be advanced through bilateral initiatives.

We are encouraged that the President has included a number of the components of our digital trade program in his 2001 Trade Agenda. We urge the US government to pursue them in a comprehensive, holistic way that brings together all the critical elements needed to advance global e-commerce and trade. But merely articulating priorities and securing congressional guidance on those priorities will not be enough.

AOL Time Warner believes strongly that our ability as a nation to advance the digital trade agenda outlined above depends upon the President’s having Trade Promotion Authority from the Congress. Absent a unified national commitment to a shared trade agenda, and the necessary governance mechanism to assure that the President can advance that agenda with confidence and authority, we risk losing a national opportunity of great import. We believe the time has come for the Congress and the President to collaborate closely to define trade negotiation objectives of our country and to ensure a mechanism to secure congressional approval of trade agreements that advance our trade objectives. Trade Promotion Authority provides such a tool.

TPA is much more than simply a legal tool. It is a demonstration of a shared commitment of the two branches of the US government responsible for the conduct of commerce and trade that America is ready to approach the rest of the world with a firm commitment to markets in commerce and ideas and to deliver to American consumers, farmers and businesses the economic and social benefits of a networked global economy.

It is equally essential that Congress continue its commitment to China’s accession to the World Trade Organization. Recognizing China’s importance to the growth and development of the global economy is an essential step to bringing about the global networked economic system that I have outlined above. We recognize that the process of WTO accession for China has proven to have taken longer than originally contemplated; we recognize that there have been significant developments in our relationship with China other than those relating to trade; but inclusion of China into the world’s trading regime remains a critical component of bringing about the full economic and social benefits of global economic and social integration.

The task of advancing a vision of digitized trade for our nation and for the world is daunting, but the opportunity -- to bring additional opportunity, prosperity and knowledge to more people -- is well worth the effort. We look forward to working with you to achieve this important goal.

Thank you.

 
 

Related Documents

 

 
 

Printer Friendly

Comment On This Page

Related Documents

 
 

Document Menu

Hearing Webcast

Invited Witnesses

Member Statements

Printed Hearing Record
(transcript)