Note: Text Only Example. This letter was sent to several organizations.
April 10, 1997
As I am sure you are aware, the Commerce Committee is examining the question of whether or not the Congress should enact legislation concerning the electricity industry. This is a complex policy area, and it is important to have as full an understanding of the facts as possible before the Committee reaches any decisions.
In order to gain a better understanding of the relevant issues, I would appreciate your answers to the following questions. To ensure these are received on a timely basis, please provide your response by May 9, 1997. Please feel free to skip a question if you do not have enough information to answer it. Also, please feel free to send any additional comments you may have on these issues.
a. Please address the general impact of such legislation. Please include in your answer your sense of whether legislation authorizing the states to resolve stranded costs issues would be beneficial from your point of view or not, and what if any risks it might pose for the federal taxpayer.b. If Congress were to enact retail competition legislation, are there any unique circumstances affecting [specific FPMA] that should be addressed? Should existing statutes be modified as part of any such bill?
I realize preparing a response to these questions will take time and effort on your part. I appreciate any help you can provide in furthering my understanding of the important issues involved in the ongoing debate on restructuring the electric power industry. Should you have any questions, please contact Sue Sheridan, Minority Counsel, at (202) 226-3400. Your response should be sent to:
The Honorable John D. Dingell, Ranking Member
Commerce Committee Democratic Office
564 Ford House Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515With every good wish.
Sincerely,
JOHN D. DINGELL
RANKING MEMBER
![]()
Back to the Electricity Restructuring Home Page