LETTERS ON CURRENT ISSUES
[Text only of letters sent from the Commerce Committee
Democrats]
Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to view the amendments which are in PDF
format.
If this format does not provide adequate access, please contact our office at
202-225-3641.
March 26, 1998
The Honorable Gerald B.H. Solomon
Chairman
Committee on Rules
H-312, The Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
We are enclosing 55 copies of a consumer protection amendment that we request be made
in order to be offered to H.R. 10, the Financial Services Act of 1998. While we disagree sharply
on other aspects of this legislation, and separately are submitting
amendments to address those concerns, we are in full agreement on the need for the House to
approve strong consumer protections as part of any financial modernization legislation. We
would appreciate the opportunity to testify at the Committee's hearing on the rule for H.R. 10.
As requested in your letter of March 19, 1998, we are providing a brief explanation of our
consumer protection amendments:
- The substitute maintains the ability of the Federal Reserve Board to enforce the banking laws
across the new financial holding companies as to nonbank affiliates, but it inexplicably deletes the
provisions enabling the SEC to make inspections of investment bank holding companies to
monitor and enforce compliance with the federal securities laws. Our amendment restores the
SEC's enforcement authority.
- The Republicans claim that the substitute will create one-stop shopping and more
competition, resulting in the delivery of more efficient and cheaper services. However, the
substitute appears to set the stage for a confusing array of new products and services, and a
plethora of new fees and commissions. Our amendment directs the financial regulators to review
existing disclosure requirements and, where needed, to promulgate rules requiring financial
services providers to give consumers and investors clear and meaningful disclosure of all fees and
commissions.
- The substitute permits banks, insurance companies, and securities firms to affiliate in the new
financial holding companies. If activities are moved out of the bank and into holding company
affiliates, these assets and the revenue generated by them will not be available to support
Community Reinvestment Act investments in communities, including the needs of low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods and persons of modest means. Our amendment requires that the
Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal bank regulators and the SEC, devise a
program to address this shortcoming and report legislative recommendations to implement that
program to Congress in one year.
- One of the eligibility requirements for the new financial holding companies is that all
subsidiary insured banks offer and maintain low-cost basic banking accounts. But this
requirement alone is excluded from the subsection on the Federal Reserve Board's enforcement of
the eligibility requirements, leaving life-line banking without an enforcement mechanism. Our
amendment corrects this oversight.
- The substitute will create financial conglomerates with access to invasive personal financial
information on the American public. Our amendment requires the Federal Trade Commission,
which is engaged in an ongoing multi-stage study of consumer privacy issues, to report to
Congress on its findings and conclusions, together with recommendations for legislative and
administrative action to protect the privacy of consumers.
- The substitute requires the Federal banking agencies to prescribe anticoercion rules
applicable to the sale of insurance but does not require general sales practice rules that address
suitability. Our amendment provides that general sales practice rules be included in the bill.
- The substitute would allow weak state consumer statutes and regulations that are
"inconsistent with or contrary to" the regulations prescribed by the federal banking agencies to
preempt stronger federal regulations. Our amendment provides that the stronger state consumer
protections will prevail, but, in any case, the federal regulations will provide a minimum level of
protection.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. We look forward to
working with you on this important legislation.
Sincerely,
JOHN D. DINGELL
RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
JOHN J. LAFALCE
RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND
FINANCIAL SERVICES
cc: The Honorable John Joseph Moakley, Ranking Member
Committee on Rules
Back to the Public Record
Home Page