|
Medicare
RX
Drug Bill's
Impact on Retirees
Fact Sheet
The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) will likely leave millions of retirees
with less, not more, prescription drug coverage. The law discourages employers
from maintaining their current prescription drug coverage to their retirees by
(1) penalizing retirees whose employers help them pay the out-of-pocket costs
for drugs, (2) allowing employers to substantially cut retiree benefits and
still get Medicare subsidies; and (3) providing less Medicare assistance per
beneficiary to employer-sponsored plans, particularly tax exempt entities, than
to Medicare prescription drug plans or HMOs. Of the 12 million retirees that
currently have employer-sponsored coverage, the Congressional Budget Office
estimates that two to three million retirees (nearly one in five Medicare
beneficiaries with retiree coverage) will lose that coverage. Of those losing
coverage, over half will have incomes below $30,000. Before the drug benefit
begins in 2006, however, retirees will be eligible to sign up for the drug
discount card, provided they are not Medicaid eligible.
MMA discourages employers from continuing to provide the generous health
plans they do today in three ways:
(1) True out-of-pocket cost or "TROOP" provision.
This
provision applies to retirees who leave their current retiree plan and
enroll in the Medicare prescription drug plans or Medicare HMOs. Under the
new law, only the amounts paid by the retiree himself, his family, or a
State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program count toward spending required to
reach the catastrophic benefit. Thus, each retiree must spend $3,600
out-of-pocket to reach the catastrophic benefit, and any money an employer
pays to help with drug co-payments and cost sharing or filling in the
retiree's donut hole will not count towards this $3,600. This
discriminatory treatment of retirees who receive assistance from employers
will delay, potentially indefinitely, the retiree's ability to reach
catastrophic protection.
(2) Subsidy for Retiree Plans. Under the new law, employers and
multi-employer groups may receive a tax-free subsidy from Medicare for the
purpose of maintaining some prescription drug coverage for their retirees if
the coverage they provide is of equal or greater value than the coverage
under Medicare Part D. Because most employers are providing coverage that is
much more generous than the coverage under the Medicare bill, employers
could slash their benefits to the Medicare level and still qualify for the
subsidy.
The subsidy is 28 percent of allowable drug costs up to $1,330 per
retiree. An employer gets the 28 percent subsidy regardless of how
much it contributes and how much it requires the retiree to pay in
co-payments and other cost sharing mechanisms -- so long as the overall
coverage is equal to or better than what Medicare provides. Thus, an
employer could reduce its contribution -- shifting more costs to the
retirees -- yet still receive the benefit of receiving 28 percent of what it
and the retiree spends together. Coupled with the long-standing tax
provision that permits employers to deduct their healthcare costs, some
companies could actually make money while providing their retirees a reduced
package of prescription drug benefits. As a result of all these laws,
companies such as Lucent Technologies, Dow Chemical, and SBC Communications
are expected to show big accounting gains, while retiree benefits erode; SBC
already announced it would reduce benefits.
(3) Discrimination in the Employer Subsidy. The new law discriminates
against employer-sponsored plans compared to Medicare prescription drug
plans offered by PPOs and HMOs. Employers will only receive a 28 percent
subsidy while the PPOs and HMOs will receive about a 73 percent subsidy in
2006 for their prescription drug plans. This is despite the fact that
currently many employer-sponsored plans have more generous benefits than the
prescription drug plans expected under the Medicare law. The law further
discriminates against state and local governments, multi-employer groups,
and non-profit organizations offering employee prescription drug coverage.
Eighteen billion dollars of additional funding was added at the last moment
by exempting the 28 percent Medicare employer subsidy from tax liability.
This was done to protect employer- sponsored retiree coverage; however, it
is useless to those with no tax liabilities. As a result, teachers,
firefighters, police officers, construction workers, and others with no tax
liabilities will not receive a dime of the $18 billion to help them continue
to offer retiree prescription drug coverage.
Interaction with Specific Types of Plans:
Currently, retirees enrolled in FEHB use Medicare as their primary coverage
and FEHB pays the cost sharing. When Medicare expands to cover drugs, the FEHB
program could continue with Medicare as primary and pay the cost sharing;
however, if FEHB decides to continue to offer the full prescription drug
benefit, it can receive the 28 percent subsidy.
Teachers' union retirees receive their health benefits in various ways,
including, collectively bargained agreements, through the state employee health
programs, or through employer agreements. The Medicare prescription drug plan
will interact differently with the different plans. However, the vast majority
of teachers' health plans require the retiree to buy into Medicare benefits
and the plan pays the cost sharing. When Medicare expands to provide drugs, the
health plans will likely continue to require the retiree to buy into Medicare.
If the plans are collectively bargained or employer plans, the plan
administrator has the option of renegotiating the agreement to continue to
provide the full benefit and receive the 28 percent subsidy or require them to
enroll in Medicare. In state plans, the state legislatures would have to act to
do the same.
The UAW provides health benefits through various contracts and retirees will
be affected differently depending upon the particular contract. A retiree could
be forced to buy into the Medicare prescription drug plan if the contract states
that a retiree must enroll in all available Medicare benefits and the plan will
provide cost sharing. It is unknown whether some of these contracts will be
renegotiated to allow retirees to retain their prescription drug coverage
through the plan.
|