Committee on Energy and Commerce, Democrats Home Page
Who We Are Schedule What's New
View Printable Version

Text only of letters sent from the Committee on Energy and Commerce Democrats.

February 11, 2002

  

Mr. Jeffrey K. Skilling
c/o Mr. Bruce Hiler
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
555 - 13th Street, N.W.
Suite 500 West
Washington, D.C. 20004

Dear Mr. Skilling:

Last week, at a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, you testified under oath that you were "not aware of any financing arrangements designed to conceal liabilities or inflate profitability"of Enron, and generally demonstrated incomplete knowledge of the related-party transactions. A document entitled: "LJM Investments, Annual Partnership Meeting, October 26, 2000" (copy attached) raises numerous questions about the nature and extent of your knowledge of these matters. This document sets out the presentations at the partnership meeting and lists you as a guest speaker.

On Friday night, Amy Flores, the former office manager for LJM, who was present at that meeting in Palm Beach, Florida, appeared on ABC News and stated that she made your hotel reservations, that you were present and, according to Ms. Flores, you made a speech to the partners to "reassure them Enron was behind the venture." Subsequent to that, Bruce Hiler, your attorney, confirmed that you had attended the partnership meeting, but that you had made a speech and left shortly thereafter. According to Mr. Hiler, you were at the hotel for only about 45 minutes.

The document presented to the LJM partners makes it clear that the acceleration of earnings recognition for Enron is one of the purposes of the partnership. Under a page entitled : "LJM Rationale: Why does Enron need private equity?", the purpose of constructing LJM was to "accelerate projected earnings and cash flow." This could not be done otherwise because "Energy and communications assets typically do not generate earnings or cash flow within the first 1-3 years" (p. 7). On page 9, also entitled "LJM Investments," two of the additional applications of private equity are listed as "Nature of earnings" and "Earnings generation."

Several Enron employees also attended this meeting, but were listed in this document as LJM representatives: these include Andrew Fastow, Michael Kopper, Kathy Lynn, Anne Yaeger, and Joyce Tang. Additionally, this document reveals that 89 percent of LJM2’s investments are related to Enron (p. 23). The return for investors is projected at 69 percent (p. 18), and 63 percent of those investments were projected to pay out in less than one year (p. 25). One investment, Raptor III, was projected to have a 2,503 percent rate of return over a three-year period.

This is an extraordinary document, supporting the Powers Report’s conclusion that "[t]hese transactions had a significant effect on Enron’s financial statements. Taken together, they resulted in substantial recognition of income, and the avoidance of substantial recognition of loss" (Report, p. 68). It also raises numerous questions (attached) that I ask you to answer for the record by no later than Monday, February 25, 2002. As they will be included in the record of the February 7, 2002, hearing, please treat your responses as made under oath.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you require further information regarding this request, please contact Edith Holleman, Minority Counsel, Committee on Energy and Commerce, at (202) 226-3400.

Sincerely,


JOHN D. DINGELL
RANKING MEMBER

Attachments (.pdf file)

cc: The Honorable W. J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman
Committee on Energy and Commerce

The Honorable James C. Greenwood, Chairman
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Committee on Energy and Commerce

The Honorable Peter Deutsch, Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Committee on Energy and Commerce

 


Attachment 1

QUESTIONS FOR MR. JEFFREY R. SKILLING

  1. Did you attend the October 26, 2000, meeting of the partners of LJM? Did you attend the entire meeting? At what time did you arrive? At what time did you leave?
  2. Where did the meeting take place? How long did it last?
  3. Were you provided with a copy of the October 26, 2000, document attached to this letter?
  4. Who made the presentation to the LJM partners referred that was the basis of this document?
  5. Were you a guest speaker at this meeting as the document states? What was the topic of your speech? How long was your speech?
  6. Who invited you to this meeting and what was the purpose of your speech and attendance?
  7. Please provide all records relating to your attendance at and participation in this meeting. This should include invitations and confirmations of your attendance and/or participation in this meeting, copies of calendars, e-mails, telephone records, drafts or notes of your remarks, travel documents, and any other documents that relate to this meeting.
  8. Did you receive any compensation or reimbursement for attending and/or speaking at this meeting? If the answer is in the affirmative, please provide all records relating to this compensation or reimbursement.
  9. Did the persons listed on page 2 (Andrew Fastow, Michael Kopper, Kathy Lynn, Anne Yaeger, Joyce Tang, Chris Loehr, and Ace Roman) attend this meeting?
  10. Was Amy Flores present and did she make a hotel reservation for you?
  11. Were these employees presented to you as attending the meeting in their role as Enron employees or as LJM representatives? Did you suggest at any time that any of these employees seek waivers of Enron code of conduct policy?
  12. Do you agree with the statement on page 7 of the attached document under the heading of "LJM Rationale: Why does Enron need private equity?" that "Energy and communications assets typically do not generate earning or cash flow within the first 1-3 years" and that these investments are "dilutive to Enron’s current EPS" and are "dilutive to credit ratings ratios"?
  13. Do you agree with the statement – again on page 7 – that to solve the problems listed above, that Enron must "deconsolidate assets" and "create structures which accelerate projected earnings and cash flow"?
  14. Do you agree with the statement on page 9 that additional applications of LJM’s private equity are "Earnings generation" and "Nature of earnings"?
  15. If you do not agree with any of these statements, please explain why Andrew Fastow, manager of the LJM partnerships, believed them to be the purpose of the LJM investments.
  16. Did you know that the return for the LJM limited partners was estimated to be 69 percent IRR or a cash multiple of 2.3X (page 18)?

 

Prepared by the Committee on Energy and Commerce
2125 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515