Mr. Andrew D. Lundquist Dear Mr. Lundquist: We are in receipt of a May 4 letter to Reps. Tauzin and Burton regarding our letter of April 19, 2001 (enclosed), requesting information and documentation relevant to the energy task force. In our letter, we expressed our concern that your task forces decision to meet behind closed doors and exclude certain parties from participation in its discussions violated not only the letter, but the spirit, of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). As Ranking Members of the House Committees with primary jurisdiction over the federal governments development and implementation of energy policy, we are troubled by your insufficient response to a straightforward request for information by elected members of the Legislative Branch. We do not believe it is appropriate for you to refuse to supply the records we had requested or to refuse to identify the members of the task force staff and the specific individuals and groups with whom they have met. Unfortunately, your actions only serve to deepen public suspicion over the Administrations apparent efforts to shield the membership and deliberations of the task force and its staff from public scrutiny. The process of energy policy development needs sunshine. At a minimum, the public has the right to know the membership of the task force and its staff; what information is being presented to the task force and its staff and by whom it is being given; and the cost of the task forces activities. The importance of disclosure is underscored by a recent press account stating that the task force and/or its staff has met with over 130 interest groups and that major Republican contributors have attended private sessions with Vice President Cheney. (Cheney Task Force Seeks Input from Interest Groups, Associated Press (May 14, 2001).) To that end, we are retransmitting our original letter to you requesting detailed answers to our questions, as well as our request for copies of all records relating to the task force. In order to help you better understand our request for records, the terms "records" and "relating" should be interpreted in accordance with the attached document, written by the House Commerce Committee Majority and used repeatedly in its information requests to the previous Administration. We look forward to receiving your thorough response to our request by no later than Tuesday, May 29, 2001. Sincerely,
HENRY A. WAXMAN Enclosures cc: The Honorable W. J. "Billy" Tauzin, Chairman The Honorable Dan Burton, Chairman Mr. David S. Addington Definitions
2. The terms "relating," "relate," or "regarding" as to any given subject means anything that constitutes, contains, embodies, identifies, deals with, or is in any manner whatsoever pertinent to that subject, including but not limited to records concerning the preparation of other records.
| |
|




