Letters

October 8, 2013 | Letter
Excerpt: To date, the administration has only provided information about the number of visits to healthcare.gov, the number of web-chats, and the number of calls to a toll-free number. No information has been released on the number of Americans that have actually enrolled. Multiple reports indicate, though, that some states failed to enroll anyone on the first day. The reasons for this are not clear. Are website failures preventing enrollment?
October 1, 2013 | Letter
Excerpt: As you are aware, Public Law No. 112-28, enacted in August 2011, directed the Commission to seek public comment on "opportunities to reduce the cost of third-party testing requirements consistent with assuring compliance with any applicable consumer product safety rule, ban, standard or regulation." To read the letter, click here. 
September 27, 2013 | Letter
Annie Appleseed Foundation  Allergy & Asthma Network Mothers of Asthmatics
September 26, 2013 | Letter
Excerpt: These controversial estimates are currently being used by federal agencies to place dollar values on the potential climate damages purportedly avoided by carbon dioxide reduction in regulatory actions, with measurements of such effects extending hundreds of years into the future. The implications of quantifying future impacts raises serious questions about how federal agencies are developing these estimates to advance rulemaking.
September 23, 2013 | Letter
Excerpt: We support the Commission's timely examination of the important issues surrounding centralized capacity markets, and today, we write to encourage the Commission to also consider the many other critical issues facing RTOs and ISOs, either as part of the capacity market proceeding or a seperate proceeding. To read the letter, click here.
September 20, 2013 | Letter
Excerpt: The questions and concerns that emerged from our review appear to be a direct result of the rushed implementation of the Navigator program by HHS and the limited time available for training Navigator grant recipient organizations and their staff… Although you acknowledged that your office is responsible for overseeing the Navigator program, you explained that you had not reviewed the individual grant applications and therefore could not comment on the individual Navigators’ planned e

Pages