Excerpt: The Secretary of Energy is responsible for establishing and carrying out EPAct05's Clean Coal Power Initiative and for helping to implement certain EPAct05 authorized clean coal tax provisions. In light of this, we seek to examine the Department of Energy's implementation of EPAct05 provisions relating to clean coal technologies and the information it developed for or shared with other federal entities relating to these provisions, particularly sections 402 and 1307 of EPAct05.
Excerpt: NRC commissioners and agency officials routinely state that our nation's nuclear plants are safe and characterize regulatory changes as "safety enhancements." In this context, deliberate and systematic cost benefit analysis is necessary to distinguish between changes that yield valid, identifiable safety benefits and changes that that merely result in unnecessary regulatory burden, diverting resources frommore safety-significant priorities.
Letters of Support for H.R. 2, the American Energy Solutions For Lower Costs and More American Jobs ActSeptember 18, 2014 | Letter
The following organizations have expressed support for H.R. 2, the American Energy Solutions for Lower Costs and More American Jobs Act: American Chemistry Council American Petroleum Institute (API)
Excerpt: We write to express concerns about the tone and tenor of letters that Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sent on June 27 and July 9, 2014, to several states. We certainly believe it is appropriate to expect accountability from states as full partners in the administration of the Medicaid program. However, these letters leave the impression that the challenges states are experiencing are wholly due to state problems, not CMS actions.
Excerpt: The report released yesterday by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on HealthCare.gov indicates that mismanagement of the website’s development by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has created numerous security vulnerabilities. This report comes just two weeks after CMS announced that a hacker had installed malicious software on a server within the HealthCare.gov network that went undetected for almost two months.
Excerpt: Despite CMS’s failure to review the details of Arkansas’ proposal, the state’s waiver assumptions generate real extra costs for federal taxpayers. GAO estimated that the spending limit that CMS approved for the state demonstration is $778 million higher than it would have been if actual payment rates for services provided to newly-eligible adult beneficiaries were included across the duration of the proposal