O&I Subcommittee Chair Griffith: “Too Many Rural Areas Unserved; Federal Broadband Efforts are Fragmented and Overlapping”

Washington, D.C. — Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chair Morgan Griffith (R-VA) delivered the following opening remarks during today’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing titled “Closing the Digital Divide: Overseeing Federal Funds for Broadband Deployment.”

Excerpts and highlights below:

MANY AMERICANS STILL LACK BROADBAND ACCESS

“I welcome our invited experts and guests to a hearing on a subject that is very important to the constituents in my district—that is access to broadband.

“For many Americans broadband has become second-nature, from sending emails, doing work, doing homework, watching our favorite shows, or ordering packages, people count on speedy and reliable broadband to connect with each other, foster new economic opportunities, and engage with the wider world.

“The need for broadband access was prominently revealed during the Coronavirus pandemic when even more activities moved online.

“Unfortunately, large sections of rural America, including much of my District, lack reliable access to broadband, putting many Americans at a disadvantage.

“The lack of broadband access in rural communities, or the digital divide, has been lessened.

Billions of dollars spent by numerous federal agencies, and yet millions of Americans still lack access.

“When it comes to broadband access, a considerable number of people aren’t under-served—they are still un-served.

“According to Government Accountability Office, or GAO, at least 17 percent of rural Americans lack access to fixed broadband.

“Defined as a minimum download speed of 25 Mega Bits Per Second and 3 Megabits Per Second upload speed. Only about 1 percent of Americans in urban areas can’t access these speeds.

“That is a population of un-served people, and this is a separate issue from the question of affordability in those areas.

“If you are un-served, it doesn’t matter how much money you may have, you cannot practically gain access.”

GOVERNMENT FUNDING HAS NOT SOLVED THE PROBLEM

“The digital divide is certainly not a new problem.

“Federal government funding appropriated to help solve the problem hasn’t been lacking.

“The federal government has been funding efforts to close the digital divide for decades and has spent billions of dollars, the problem has not improved as quickly or completely as was expected. And millions of Americans still lack access.

“Most recently, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 allocated nearly $48 billion to support broadband deployment in unserved and underserved areas: $42.45 billion through the ‘Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment,’ program also known as the ‘BEAD’ program, $2 billion for the Tribal Connectivity Program, $1 billion for the Middle Mile Grant Program, and $2 billion for the ReConnect Program.

“And as I noted before the bill passed, no preference was given to unserved areas over underserved areas.

“The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, known as NTIA, housed inside the Department of Commerce, is in charge of administering the majority of these funds.

“Prior to these programs, from 2015 to 2020 the Federal Government invested about $44 billion to increase Americans’ access to broadband and yet millions of Americans still lack access.”

FRAGMENTED AND OVERLAPPING FEDERAL EFFORTS

“Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, a recent GAO report, highlighted how federal efforts to expand access to broadband have been riddled with the classic problems we see with government run programs.

“According to the GAO, federal broadband efforts are ‘fragmented and overlapping.’

“Within the many federal programs relating to increasing broadband access there is potential for overlap, duplication and conflicting messages.

“Current federal efforts to increase broadband access involve more than 100 programs administered by 15 federal agencies.

“And yet millions of Americans still lack access.

“Think of that—15 agencies with 100 programs riddled with a lack of coordination.

“And to make it worse, according to the GAO report from last May, the United States broadband efforts are not guided by a national strategy with clear roles, goals, objectives and performance measures.

“Also troubling, is that, according to the GAO, the administration has not decided if a national strategy is needed.

“I would submit that a national strategy is necessary, and strong leadership to coordinate all of these agencies’ spending on broadband access is needed.

“GAO has identified the Federal Communications Commission and the NTIA as having significant roles in expanding broadband access and I look forward to this Committee conducting additional oversight of those federal agencies and their spending on broadband.

“Today, however, I am curious to hear from our witnesses about the various challenges currently facing the government agencies tasked with expanding Americans’ access to broadband and I look forward to their testimony.

“And hopefully soon, millions of Americans who don’t have broadband, will gain access.”